Establishing Toxicological/Biological Equivalence After Undisclosed Additive Change in Medical-Grade Resin
Solutions
Toxicology Risk Assessment
Industries
Medical Devices; Combination Products; Drug Products, Personal Care Products

Challenge

A medical device manufacturer was informed by their polymer supplier that the additive package in a key resin had been modified due to global sourcing constraints. While the base polymer remained unchanged, the supplier declined to disclose full chemical identities of the new additives, citing proprietary formulation protection.
The sponsor had already completed an E&L study on the original resin for their device and now needed to determine if the new resin posed any new toxicological risk, without access to a full additive disclosure and without repeating all biocompatibility testing.

Chemva’s Solution

Chemva recommended a dual Toxicological Risk Assessment (TRA) strategy, using results from E&L testing performed on both the original and modified resins, to establish toxicological equivalency based on exposure safety, aligned with ISO 10993-17 and FDA/EU expectations.
Step-by-Step Approach:

  1. Review of Available Data:
    • Evaluated supplier-provided CoAs and technical documentation.
    • Confirmed that both resins as part of the finished device underwent E&L testing under ISO 10993-18 conditions, using identical extraction protocols and analytical platforms.
  2. Extractables Comparison:
    • Cross-referenced the compounds detected between the two materials.
    • We identified a small number of new constituents in the updated device, but the general chemistry was similar to the original device.
    • Performed TRAs on both E&L datasets and determined the margin of safety (MoS) for all constituents was above 1.
  3. Equivalency Justification:
    • Documented a side-by-side comparison of E&L profiles, highlighting that no significantly hazardous new compounds were introduced.
    • Developed a Toxicological Equivalence Justification Report referencing ISO 10993-17 and aligning with FDA guidance on material changes.

Impact Delivered

  • Chemva’s TRA-based approach eliminated the need for additional biological testing in addition to E&L studies, saving the sponsor an estimated $100K and 6 months in testing.
  • Enabled the sponsor to secure continued supply and move forward with device production despite limited transparency from the supplier.
More Case Studies
More Case Studies That Reflect Your Area of Interest
Explore additional case studies that address similar challenges, industries, or technical domains — and see how Chemva’s expertise translates across different projects.
Toxicology Risk Assessment
Establishing Toxicological/Biological Equivalence After Undisclosed Additive Change in Medical-Grade Resin
Chemva recommended a dual Toxicological Risk Assessment (TRA) strategy, using results from E&L testing
Toxicology Risk Assessment
Extractables / Leachables (E/L)
In-Silico Genotoxicity Assessment for Drug Packaging-Related Impurities
Chemva performed a tiered in-silico genotoxicity assessment using (Q)SAR tools and expert toxicological interpretation to classify the packaging-derived impurities per ICH M7 guidelines.
Toxicology Risk Assessment
Biocompatibility
Addressing Carcinogenicity Concerns Without E&L for EU MDR Submission
Chemva proposed and executed a paper-based Material Risk Assessment (MRA) specifically designed to address both genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogenicity pathways.
Chemical Characterization
Assessing the Impact of Antioxidant Reduction in a Container Closure System
Chemva performed a comprehensive risk assessment focused on understanding whether the antioxidant reduction would materially impact the polymer’s performance, stability, or toxicological profile.
Chemical Characterization
Biocompatibility
Resolving Unknown Extractables to Enable Pivotal Clinical Study
Chemva swiftly conducted a comprehensive Material Risk Assessment
Biocompatibility
Material Science
Defending Polymer Stability with Historical Use and Material Science
Chemva led a detailed material-specific risk assessment, supported by both scientific literature and historical clinical use.
Toxicology Risk Assessment
Avoiding Simulated E&L Testing Through Read-Across Toxicological Risk Assessment
Chemva conducted a comprehensive Toxicological Risk Assessment (TRA) using a read-across strategy, allowing us to bridge data gaps with scientifically valid surrogate information.
Chemical Characterization
Biocompatibility
Reverse Engineering Competitor Device Materials and Surface Coatings
Chemva designed and executed a custom reverse engineering plan targeting both bulk materials and surface coatings of the competitor’s connector and delivery components.
Chemical Characterization
Material Science
Biocompatibility
Establishing Material Equivalence After a Raw Material Supplier Manufacturing Site Change
Chemva conducted a comprehensive material equivalency assessment to evaluate potential variations between batches sourced from the original and new manufacturing sites.
Chemical Characterization
Toxicology Risk Assessment
Identifying Formaldehyde Risk Through Material Risk Assessment for a Medical Device
Chemva conducted a systematic, material-specific MRA, analyzing each component and processing additive and manufacturing steps to identify chemical structures or precursors associated with CoCs.
Material Science
Biocompatibility
Custom Formulating a Non-PTFE Lubricious Coating to Solve Supply Chain Constraints & Incoming Regulations
Leveraging our deep expertise in biocompatible coatings and polymer systems, Chemva led a coating reformulation and optimization program tailored to the device’s surface, application method, and clinical use.
Material Science
Material Compatibility Assessment for Solvent-Bonded Luer Hub Assembly
Chemva led a material compatibility evaluation using HansenSolubility Parameters (HSP) to scientifically assess the interaction potentialbetween each candidate hub material, the bonding solvent, and the polyurethanetubing.
Extractables / Leachables (E/L)
Biocompatibility
Toxicology Risk Assessment
Identifying Critical Gaps with E&L Protocol to Ensure Seamless PMA Application
Chemva conducted a comprehensive review of the E&L protocol, evaluating analytical strategies, extraction conditions, and toxicological relevance.
Material Science
Extractables / Leachables (E/L)
Virtual Project Management
Proactive Semi-Targeted E&L Strategy for a Polymer-Additive-Based Medical Device
Chemva’s semi-targeted E&L design eliminated potential FDA objections before they could be raised.
Material Science
Virtual Project Management
Securing Product Integrity with Reliable Raw Materials Supply
Chemva developed and implemented a risk-based supplier qualification framework
Biocompatibility
Biological Evaluation Plan (BEP) for a Next-Generation Implantable Device
Developed a risk-based BEP to meet FDA and ISO 10993-1 standards, helping the client avoid delays and save $300K through targeted testing.
Failure Analysis & CAPA
Materials
Connectors Cracking: A Root Cause Analysis and Material Selection Effort
Chemva’s systematic approach not only resolved the cracking issue but also enhanced the product’s long-term reliability and manufacturability.
Biocompatibility
Overcoming Adverse Sensitization Results
Chemva led a contextual data evaluation to assess whether the positive result represented a real clinical risk.
Biocompatibility
When Failed Cytotoxicity Is Not the Whole Story
Chemva’s strategic data interpretation helped the partner avoid unnecessary re-testing and product reformulation
Material Science
Extractables / Leachables (E/L)
Strategic Vendor Selection for Biocompatible Polymers in Inhaler Development
Chemva implemented a multi-step vendor qualification strategy to identify a reliable source of medical-grade polymer materials.
Consulting. Collaborating. Catalyzing.
Accelerating innovation through expert solutions, teamwork, and education.